Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

What is it about the past that gets people so infatuated?  The Music of the mid 20th century is often considered the greatest of all time, yet it’s had 50 years to get better with age.   Certain songs and artists are surrounded by a certain level of mystique.  For example, when I was a kid, I was convinced that there was some kind of divine intervention in the creation of Stairway to Heaven.

Now people will always argue that music changes with time.  You can either embrace it or hate it, yet isn’t it funny how so often, what we consider to be the best is already behind us? 


So on the eve of Australia’s great race, the Bathurst 1000, it’s fitting to take a look at the history of the race and how everyone who follows seems so obsessive over the past.  The ‘good old days’ was a time when the drivers were larrikins and the cars were relatively stock standard and dangerously fast.  There was enough diversity to keep any race punter entertained with more makes than you could poke a stick at.

These days all the cars are identical, and the racing is closer than ever.   I like the old days but if 2013 turns out  to be a repeat of Peter Brock’s six lap annihilation of 1979, I’ll be very disappointed. People can reminisce, but the last 5 years of Bathurst have been the most exciting in its long history.

It’s funny how the gift of hindsight makes us see the world differently.  People have such a longing for the past to the point that they remember things as being better than they really were.  We tend to romanticise about past events and people creating a false sense of them. 

John Lennon seems to have suffered this fate as has Elvis.  In death they’ve become such symbols of pop culture and remembered so fondly by so many people.  But have their legacies been blown out of proportion?  If they came back would they laugh at the way people still idolise and adore them?  

So if we fast forward to today’s pop stars, with their mass following, it’s interesting to contemplate how they might be viewed in 20 years.  Are we going to look back on this time in music history with fondness a say ‘That Justin Beiber sure was a legend’  or ‘Gee I miss Miley Cyrus, she was such a good advocate for women’s rights.’ 

 Are we going to remember this time in music history as being better than it really was?

What do you guys think?


Posted: October 9, 2013 in Uncategorized

foo fighters

Photo: ‘Foo Fighters Dave Grohl by Razvan Orendovici

Licence at

where did it go wrong

Did you know that many of today’s pop stars are employed by the government? 

Actually that’s a lie, but you could be forgiven for thinking they were after I’m finished with this post.

The problem I have with the whole situation is the loss of integrity that music once had in the mainstream.  As I’ve spoken about in previous posts, the 60’s were a political time in music, which gifted the world many great songs.  Artists were the voice of the people, and Bob Dylan was considered the voice of a generation even though he might not have seen it that way. 

Today however, music is sexualised, and it reeks of the consumerist ideology.  The mainstream music of today is not dealing with the problems our society is facing; rather it has become a part of the problem.  Film clips, with rappers preaching about how much money they have, driving around in Lamborghini’s whilst practically naked women dance like they’re some kind of domesticated pet.

These are the ideals set forth, which are taken on board by young people.  You just have to look around and see the ignorance of the society we live in to grasp an appreciation for the depth of the problem.  Perhaps I’m a pessimist, yet I see an overwhelming majority following suit, accepting such ideals set forth as the ‘right way’.  People are obsessed with body image.  They’re obsessed with buying more, consuming more as we’re all led to believe that ‘bigger is better’.   In the meantime our world is facing the dire consequences of excessive consumption, and music which I believe to be one of the most powerful mediums in shaping the beliefs of young people is saying, lets consume more, lets sexualise and lets breed.

At the end of the day, this is what governments and corporations want.  They want populations to grow and people to consume more, because this is what’s powering our economy.  Meanwhile all the so called ‘cool’ pop stars out there are seen as rebels in the eyes of young people.  But these pop stars are not rebels, what they are is a bunch of shallow sell outs who are conforming to the manufactured structure of our society set forth by a ruling class.  They are selling to the next generation a bunch of ideals that will encourage them to follow a life dictated by monetary gain.  These pop stars are glorifying the very things which are leading to the human race’s downfall.

Posted: October 4, 2013 in Uncategorized


Photo: ‘Neil Young’ by Man Alive!
Licence at

Rock and roll is dead

Posted: October 2, 2013 in Music, Uncategorized

Why Evolution Is True

This is the second installment in the “Hey kids, get off of my lawn!” series.

I woke up this morning and, during desultory browsing of the internet, found an announcement of Avril Lavigne’s latest song, “Rock”. Have a listen, if you can stand it.

Here’s what’s wrong with this song, and with many rock songs and videos these days:

  • Blatant product placement
  • No musicality: shouting
  • Song shows no signs of creativity; sounds like many other songs on the air. Tune (if there is one) is dull; words forgettable.
  • Attempt to cover up lack of creativity with shock value: cursing; girl-on-girl kiss featuring Danica McKellar (think Katy Perry); superheroes; and even a shark beheaded by a buzzsaw. Other recent music videos have covered up the lack of interesting music with unclad women.
  • AUTOTUNING (voices are adjusted electronically): the curse of modern rock.  Who had that bad idea, which is grossly overused?

View original post 515 more words

It’s the emotional climax that has defined so many classic songs.  The guitar solo has been responsible for turning many a musician into a legend.  In the 60’s Clapton was God, until Hendrix showed why he was the greatest of all time.   Jimi Hendrix playing guitar is a mesmerising experience.  Perhaps not as technically accomplished as others who followed, Hendrix free spirited creativity made up for that two fold, his hands seamlessly flowing across the neck.  It’s like he hadn’t learnt how to play; he was just born to play.

Jimi Hendrix was like so many others performers of the twentieth century; talented beyond comprehension and full of passion and soul that poured out through their music.  The versatility of the guitar itself had afforded so many musicians throughout history, the ability to carve their own unique sound to the point where a style of playing is as individual as the sound of a singer’s voice.

 But it’s fair to say that today; the popular performers are rarely seen with a guitar.  Actually, they probably can’t even play one or any instrument for that matter.  Today it’s more about dance moves or how raunchy a film clip can be.

 But the one thing that saddens me more than anything is the demise of the guitar solo (and saxophone solo for that matter).  It’s been replaced in most pop songs by a rapper with poor grammar speaking  mundane lyrics most probably with a choice of profanities thrown in for good measure.   But then again, even for the rock bands I’ve heard on commercial radio, there seems to be a lack of soulful guitar playing.  It’s as if a guitar solo is seen as excessive or something. Perhaps even uncool, or too 1980’s.

 It’s not like people aren’t playing instruments anymore.  There is undeniably loads of talented musicians out there, but for some reason, the music industry for the most part is favouring watered down trash.  It’s not just guitars; all instruments are being oppressed in the face of what I call digitised music.  Saxophone solos of passion are long gone, the dreamscapes Pink Floyd painted with a lap steal are reserved for the past and the mesmerising drums of Soul Sacrifice seem a distant memory of Woodstock.

 It’s the beauty of music that allows a song without words to somehow find a way to say the things words can’t say at all.  Music would be all the more powerful in today’s world if people would only look beyond the words and image to appreciate the most important part; the music.

As a biased lover of music, I’ll try hard here to not offend others choice of music.  I accept that everyone has the choice to listen to what they want, and everyone has the choice to watch the X Factor if they want to.  For the average person, such a program offers reasonable entertainment value, especially at the beginning of a series when it’s fair to say, the quality makes for a good laugh. 

Viewers sit glued to the box in anticipation of the next young talent deemed to have the ‘X factor’ by the panel of ‘capable’ judges.  But as a very casual viewer of this program, it leads me to question the authority of judges to choose who becomes the next pop star.  Foo Fighters front man Dave Grohl has publicly criticised such programs for undermining the important values of music. He argues that music is really about friends getting together and learning to play instruments whilst sounding like shit.  Lets face it, all bands sound like shit at first, it takes time for musicians to find their feet and get comfortable playing with other musicians.  But this learning process is what creates originality. 

Back to X Factor, and we see a kid turn up as a no body. He’s deemed by a pop star to be industry relevant, and then nurtured and coached by the judges and other industry leaders.  Given a few months the kid’s now a pop sensation.  Now of course it’s all a bit of fun for the kid, and commercial television networks are loving the ratings, but for the population of younger viewers (and many older viewers who should know better), what they watch then gives them a false impression of what’s really important in music.

As I feel my personal taste get in the way of a balanced argument here I’ll try to scale it back a little.  Yes I’m biased, but I think that one of the most important, universal qualities of music which has been forgotten is sincerity and honesty.  That is the ability for the artist to perform as themselves, not as something manufactured.  As a lover of good music, no matter what it is, the thing I appreciate more than anything is when you can tell that the artist means what they sing.  Whether it’s about a personal experience, or an issue that’s pissed them off, music that’s made with conviction is always good music.  It may not align with my tastes, and it might not align with yours, let’s face it everyone has their own taste and that’s certainly a good thing.  But sooner or later someone’s got to stand up and put a stop to this shallow trend in music.

I guess the only saving grace, is that most contestants fail to forge a lasting career in music.  After the show ends, so too does their 5 minutes of fame.  Sure it was a bit of fun while it lasted, but really, I’m yet to see any television music competition like the X Factor produce a talent that makes my jaw drop.

What has happened to the political and social activism of music; the music that once attempted to speak out and convey important messages.  Today, mainstream pop music reflects primarily issues of money, sex and greed.  This presents a serious issue, as the youth today become more concerned with instant gratifications, and become less aware of the wider world that exists out there.  Political ignorance is indeed a bi-product of this.  If in the 60’s teenagers were engaged with the political issues surrounding the Vietnam war through artists like Creedence and Bob Dylan, today Justin Beiber entertains the youth market with songs about boyfriends, whilst Kesha sings about getting drunk.  Something is seriously wrong with society if this is what has become of mankind’s greatest creation- music. 

I for one can not understand why music today is not more engaged with the issues that face society.  The world is undergoing greater changes now than ever before in history yet mainstream pop music is burying its head in the sand.  It seems that being politically ignorant has been made to seem cool.  Being disengaged with important issues, and even acting dumb are the ideals set forth by current pop stars.  Where are the songs about climate change or the continuing war in the Middle East?  I’m sure someone could offer some examples, but the point is there is nowhere near the same amount of musical engagement with these issues as there was during the Vietnam War. 

Some may question the point of this.  Why does music even matter to political or social issues?  Well it’s fair to say that for the younger members of Generation Y, the music they’re listening to isn’t encouraging them to take action, but rather head to the nearest nightclub and get plastered!  It’s glorifying a pretend lifestyle of consume more and you’ll be happy.  It basically implies that for all the bad that’s happening in the world, everything will be alright.  Well guess what, everything is NOT going to be alright!

If you find yourself dissatisfied with mainstream music today, then you’re probably not alone.  Yet given the widespread popularity of what can only be described as mundane music devoid of any artistic credibility, you’d think you were standing alone.  As a lover of classic rock and roll, I’m going to have to try hard not to be biased, yet there are times when I think I might be the only living member of Gen Y with any musical taste left.  Of course there are many gen Y’s out there who love older music and share my opinions of the present, yet it seems the musically ignorant are the target of a music industry intent on appealing to this market.

But why has it come to this?  Is it a simply a case that the gold mine of musical creativity has dried up, or has the drop in creativity been driven by the consumers.  Personally, I don’t accept for one minute that the ideas have run out.  In the last ten years there’s been loads of great music, much of which has come from either artists outside of the mainstream, or from artists who were well established 30 years ago.  But despite this, it seems that the musically ignorant still have priority over the rest of us.  As a result, I and many others like me are force fed with pop music that supposedly everyone likes.  

It’s sad to think that the pop stars of today are even considered to have talent, when the noise they make can hardly be classified as music.  Today the emphasis is on image over sound.  How many of today’s mainstream pop stars can even play a musical instrument?  I’m sick and tired of seeing guitars used as props!  Seriously, if you’re not going to play the thing, don’t hold onto it in a film clip!

What ever happened to good music?

Posted: September 17, 2013 in Music, Uncategorized

cover photo

There is something fundamentally wrong with mainstream music today. What ever happened to the music that once attempted to speak out and stand up for what’s right. Today, mainstream pop music reflects primarily issues of money, sex and greed. Consumerism is the glorified commodity of music in the mainstream. But don’t despair. There is still good music out there. It’s time society encouraged the real musicians, who actually have something important to say so that our generation too, can leave a legacy of great music!